Thursday, December 12, 2013

Watching Wheatley

British director Ben Wheatley may be one of my new favorite directors, but it's hard to pin down why. So far, he's got four features under his belt: Down Terrace (2009), Kill List (2011), Sightseers (2012), and A Field in England (2013). I consumed the Kill List immediately after finishing Down Terrace. After two months, I took a trip to A Field in England after obsessively watching the trailer on YouTube for nearly a half a year, and the following day I found that Sightseers had been added to Netflix. You can guess what happened next. After seeing all four of them so close together, I'm still don't know what draws me to him.

In the beginning, there was Down Terrace, as it and Kill List were available on Netflix and still are as of this post. The two couldn't be more radically different in tone. I can best describe Down Terrace as a dark comedy, whereas Kill List is simply dark. And it could be argued both are family dramas. But the former is about freshly-released bumbling paranoid criminals seeing out their betrayer while the latter is about a hitman with a wife and kid who gets increasingly violent and paranoid. Down Terrace still has its share of violence but they are mostly quick cut. Man is killed with hammer. On to the next scene. Kill List, however, seems to linger on those moments. Man is killed with hammer. Killer keeps swinging.

Of the two, Down Terrace is the easier to recommend because it's lighter. It deals with heavy subject matter, sure, but it doesn't sit with you quite like Kill List does because it provides you plenty of humor to keep the tone light and amusing. These aren't the hardened professional criminals they want folks to believe they are; they're too clumsy for that. Kill List, on the other hand, is unrelenting. That made me feel like I watched Straw Dogs for the first time. A claustrophobic conclusion that is one of the more disturbing endings to a movie I can think of.

And yet, I wanted more. Not more of the unrelenting cold of Kill List, but more of Wheatley's work. What else could he do? A period piece? Surely, you jest. But he did one, and it doesn't feel much like a period piece at all. Yes, everybody's costumed up in 17th-century garb, and there's a certain way some characters speak that reminds you this takes place more than a few years ago, but there seems to be more going on than in another period piece like, say, this year's Great Expectations. Maybe it's the mushrooms most of the characters are force-fed that gives it that different feel. And an esoteric ending that I'm still working out.

Sightseers is more straightforward: a couple go RV-ing across England. But the man is a serial killer and the woman starts to open her mind to her partner's criminal tendencies. It's a funny movie, more so than the rest of Wheatley's work, including Down Terrace. But like the rest, it's dark. People die, and they don't go in funny ways. One does, but it's funny from a point of irony but little more.

It's impossible to ignore the body count in each one of Wheatley's movies. The highest is Kill List's (go figure), but in each of the movies there are at least four deaths. It's not surprising given that each of the films focus on criminals. Ben Wheatley could also be obsessed with death or it's an easy way to commit dramatic action to film or print, but either way the body count is as consistent as his casting of Michael Smiley in each movie:


Structurally, each of the films are divided into distinctive chapters. It's most explicit in Down Terrace and Kill List, as each is split up by days of the week and people on a kill list, respectively. But the dismantling remains in Sightseers and A Field in England as well. Each location that the couple visits in Sightseers is established with a shot of the RV pulling onto a road towards a museum or campground, almost as if the signage on the road are the titles introducing the next sequence. A Field in England's approach is perhaps the most peculiar in that there are a few moments when the cast are frozen as if posing for a painting. Some of them are frozen in an action, while others are posed unnaturally. Each time this happens seems to introduce a significant scene. It's different, and it's easily one of my favorite things about that film.

It could be that criminal element that drives me to watch Ben Wheatley's movies. After all, criminals are fun to watch. But what impresses me most about his body of work is that, despite the shared elements, each of these movies could not differ more. I look forward to whatever he's got next just to see where he goes. And to keep count of the deaths.

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

A Case for Arrogance

Last month marked the the fifth anniversary of me knowing about National Novel Writing Month, or “NaNoWriMo” as the cool kids call it, and my second failed attempt at it. Every few days I received updates from the official NaNoWriMo website, subject line reading “Your NaNo Updates.” The truth of the matter was they weren't my updates. They weren’t about anything I was writing or anything my two NaNoWriMo buddies were working on. Most of it was “Pep Talk” from famous writers that, while probably helpful, never got my attention.

I don’t mean to say that I’m above it. While half of my brain harbors that arrogance that all writers have--otherwise they wouldn’t be writing--the other half asks myself what the hell I think I’m doing. Unfortunately, for the last few years now, that second voice has been most vocal.

There was a dry spell of writing for me after the end of my last semester of undergrad. I had the upper-level fiction class left to take and I was forced to take it with a professor who was notorious for harsh criticism in both literature and writing classes. I was never clear on his credentials for teaching a creative writing class. All I could read on him was his anti-genre elitism and vaguely sexist attitude. That class ended with me getting a B--my only B of all of my creative writing courses--and losing confidence in my writing. Maybe he was right: maybe I was a hack (my words, not his). I’ll never know why I got a B in the class and why some others got As, but I’m not about to ask him. At least some of my arrogance still sits in me.

It took a class in grad school taught by (Warning: NAME DROP) Roxane Gay to rekindle that spirit in me. Her criticism was blunt but not hurtful. For a time, I felt like I could ride that bicycle of writing all over again. I did for that semester and it felt good. But then the rest of grad school happened and ate up what time I could spend to think about writing. and then finally the thesis came which became composition priority Number One.

So here I am now, long after the hustle and bustle of graduate school, master’s degree in hand and I find I’m not writing anything except this blog. NaNoWriMo looked as good an opportunity as any to get back to it. I had all sorts of fiction ideas swimming through my head. A few days before NaNoWriMo started I even got to work on one of them. Did I fire off too soon?

As November progressed, I saw updates from old classmates on Facebook updating us with their progress in NaNoWriMo. They put up a better fight than I ever did. One had been sick and took a break from it. I wish I had that excuse.

NaNoWriMo is a lovely idea, truly. It gets those who aren’t writing otherwise to start thinking about it and doing it. If it gets people just thinking about it that aren’t otherwise, I’d say NaNoWriMo fulfilled some portion of its purpose. But then I think of the temporal boundaries of the month. Never have they claimed that they only want folks writing in the month of November. But there is a finality about November 30. Did you get those 50,000 words written? No? Well, you tried. Halfway through the month I realized I hadn’t written a single word for it yet and decided, “Screw it,” because what’s the point of trying to reach 50,000 words when I didn’t have 25,000 halfway through.

It’s a terrible attitude. Truly god awful. It’s especially ridiculous to pin it on an organization which has no goal other than getting folks to write. But this is the attitude you get when you need an audience, when you go from thinking you’re hot shit to knowing you’re just shit. I feel like Samson with a crewcut.

Without some sort of support network, I’ve found that writing, both during and outside of NaNoWriMo, is difficult. There are those who write for themselves, but I’m not one of them. I’ve always thrived in the workshop setting. Being an interstate immigrant to Arkansas, I’ve lost that ability to physically gather folks to a writing workshop. There is the prospect of a virtual one via Facebook with some grad schoolmates. Maybe they can stoke the fire of my arrogance.