This party apparently had two cakes.
Maybe I’m biased. Though I find Katy Perry aesthetically
pleasing, I find most of her musical catalog aurally repugnant. In fact, I can’t
summon a single song of hers that I can enjoy. So already I
approach her single “Birthday” with skepticism and disgust after recognizing her
vocal work from the get-go. She’s a capable singer, I’ll grant her that. But
even though she collaborated with four other writers, the song couldn’t be any
less boring or formulaic.
The lyrics aren’t subtle in the least: “Pop your confetti /
Pop your perignon / So hot and heavy / ‘Til Dawn,” and later, “So let me get
you in your birthday suit / It’s time to bring out the big balloons.” This isn’t
to say you shouldn’t write songs about sex; Prince established a music empire
solely on lyrics of lovemaking, and it’s one of the oldest subjects sang about
since we discovered that our vocal cords make pretty noises. But at least make
a half-assed attempt to be clever about it. The word “party” is used in that
vague way that suggests more than cake and ice cream, Also, the fact that the
speaker wants the subject to “pop” two different things that produce two
substantially different substances makes me concerned for both parties.
The speaker is also ambiguous about her relationship to the
subject. One might be quick to assume that they’re in a girlfriend-boyfriend
pairing, but the opening lines suggest something far more complicated: I heard
you’re feeling / Nothing’s going right / Why don’t let me / Stop By,” and
later, “You know that I’m the girl that you should call.” The second passage
suggests that the subject has a harem of female acquaintances that he could
select from. Why would a girlfriend tell her boyfriend he can call he when he's in Frowntown? But the speaker insists that she has what it takes to turn his
proverbial frown upside-down.
In spite of the speaker’s good intentions, the chorus makes
me want to fall on my sword:
Boy, when you’re with me
I’ll give you a taste.
Make it like your birthday everyday.
I know you like it sweet,
So you can have your cake.
Give you something good to celebrate.
So make a wish.
I’ll make it like your birthday everyday.
I’ll be your gift
Give you something good to celebrate.
It reads like the death rattle of a metaphor. Here she uses
the birthday analogy in almost every configuration uniform to the North American
tradition of the birthday party. We get cake eating, wish making, gift giving—the
three primary pillars stand firm even though it feels like Miss Perry and her
writing collective are somehow picking up the pillars and beating me
senselessly with them. Maybe that’s why the song falls apart.
After the vaguely Daft Punk-sounding bridge, Miss Perry
says, “Happy Birthday” in a way that sounds like an attempt to emulate Marilyn
Monroe’s famous “Happy Birthday, Mr. President.” It’s not true enough to the
original to make me confident that it is in fact what she’s going for, but I’m
distracted by it. I’m bothered by it.
I find the melody problematic. In spite of the song’s upbeat disco tempo, we’re left with a dull and ultimately unsexy background to supposedly sexy lyrics. The way she sings the last two words on certain lines like “’Til Dawn” and “’Stop by” feels discordant with the melody as it doesn’t quite keep up the song’s rhythm. This happens enough times that it’s noticeably awkward and feels as though they just gave up when they got to the final lines of those stanzas. The notes also sound as though they don’t offer the temporal finality that we expect from the end of a stanza. But it’s been a while since I took a music theory class so I can’t eloquently or accurately articulate what it is about the song that makes it so boring, so you’ll just have to cope with that. In a way, it looks constructed with the sort of ease of Lego, yet looks like something a three-year-old might put together with a Duplo brick: it technically fits but looks clunky and unsophisticated, and is less fun to step on.
I find the melody problematic. In spite of the song’s upbeat disco tempo, we’re left with a dull and ultimately unsexy background to supposedly sexy lyrics. The way she sings the last two words on certain lines like “’Til Dawn” and “’Stop by” feels discordant with the melody as it doesn’t quite keep up the song’s rhythm. This happens enough times that it’s noticeably awkward and feels as though they just gave up when they got to the final lines of those stanzas. The notes also sound as though they don’t offer the temporal finality that we expect from the end of a stanza. But it’s been a while since I took a music theory class so I can’t eloquently or accurately articulate what it is about the song that makes it so boring, so you’ll just have to cope with that. In a way, it looks constructed with the sort of ease of Lego, yet looks like something a three-year-old might put together with a Duplo brick: it technically fits but looks clunky and unsophisticated, and is less fun to step on.
I don't think I've listened to this abhorrent song yet. I think.
ReplyDeleteThe lyrics betray a pop star whose background is conservative christian. You got to rebel against your past/background and all that.
Great call on Prince.
Link: http://diaspora.video.az/en/video/10392/prince-cream-youtube.com
Let it never be said that Prince is subtle.
Delete